Skill · Content writing
SEO content writing work I have been hired to do
I write content that has to rank and has to be right. Most of what I am hired for sits in awkward categories: health, legal status, finance, regulated products. Those are the ones where getting a fact wrong is not an embarrassment, it is a liability for the client.
So the research comes before the writing, every claim gets a source, and the sourcing standard is written down so anybody can check it afterwards.
43 + 20
US states and countries fact-checked against primary sources on one project
5
Live legal statuses found wrong on that site and corrected
1,600 to 2,500
Typical words in a pillar piece, structured around real queries
16
Content categories in a teaching library I write and maintain
- Typical output
- 1,600 to 2,500 word pillars, cluster sets, commercial service and location pages.
- Sectors
- Health, legal status, financial services, regulated products, education.
- Standards
- Primary-source verification, documented house style, written QA checklist per piece.
- Research
- Competitor organic keyword sets pulled before outlining, not a topic brainstorm.
- Deliverables
- Brief, draft, interlink plan, metadata and schema, ready to publish.
- Engagement
- Single pieces, ongoing programmes, content audits, or setting editorial standards for a team.
What I am usually asked for
- Pillar and cluster content planned against real keyword data, not a topic brainstorm
- Commercial service and location pages that have to convert, not just rank
- Regulated and sensitive copy: health, legal status, financial services
- Programmatic page sets, where hundreds of pages share a structure and must still read well
- Rewrites and expansions of existing pages that are underperforming
- Content audits: what to keep, what to merge, what to delete
- Editorial standards and house formats a client's own team can then follow
How I work
I start with the page that currently ranks first, pull its full organic keyword set, and find out what it is actually earning traffic for. That is usually different from what the brief assumed.
Then each secondary query gets its own heading, because each one is its own ranking opportunity rather than a synonym to sprinkle in.
Then it gets QA'd against a written checklist before anybody sees it. On the last pillar I wrote, my own check caught that the head phrase did not appear in the body once. Fixed before it went anywhere.